![]() ![]() ![]() From the correspondence education using primarily print-based materials to the extent of the use of internet and the technological improving, the development of LMS has been possible. These external resources such as popular tools in the classroom (Google Apps, Wordpress, Slack, iTunes, etc.) or technological advances that allow gamification, Adaptive Learning Technologies or Open Educational Resources (OER) are not always integrated into LMS. LMS have allowed learning analytics, adaptive learning (chapter 10) and dynamic social exchanges, but the report indicates that there is a need for new models, highlighting the conclusion reached by the 2017 Panel of Experts in Higher Education: LMS are owned by companies that control the platforms, making it difficult to integrate external resources that are better adapted to learning needs. Although the percentage of LMS corresponding to alternative learning platforms and course development is minority, since 2011, MOOC courses have generated new possibilities. In The NMC Horizon Report: 2017 (Adams Becker, Cummins, Davis, Freeman, Hall Giesinger & Ananthanarayanan, 2017), it is indicated that, in the case of higher education, the most widespread brands of LMS are: Canvas, Blackboard, Moodle, Edmodo, Desire2Learn and Sakai. LMS make up the largest segment of the learning system market (Davis, Carmean & Wagner, 2009). The first LMS appeared in higher education in the late 1990s, but nowadays the majority of LMS are related to corporate market. In this context, we highlight Learning Management System (LMS), a concept emerged from e-Learning. Using technologies in educational context responds to a need to promote the efficiency of teaching, flexibility and connections with the student’s reality (Alshormar & Bawaneh, 2018). Martinez-garcia,Evolución de una plataforma educativa como herramienta de evaluación y formación de ingenieros,no,(2016).Į-learning, system, comparison, platforms.In recent years, educational environments around the world have increased the interest in e-learning in order to adapt to educational needs of student population. Iftakhar,Google classroom: what works and how?, 3 (2016) 12–18. Alfonso,Proposal of a guide of personalization of Moodle at the university of informatic sciences,Rev. ![]() Castro Molano,Estudio comparativo de sistemas de gestión del aprendizaje: Moodle, ATutor, Claroline, Chamilo y Universidad de Boyacá,Acad. Williams, The impact of organisational support, technical support, and self-efficacy on faculty perceived benefits of using learning management system, Behav. Yamamoto,A proposal of an education method for dress-making utilizing learnig management system, ICCSE 2016 - 11th Int. Sarmiento Campos,Un estudio sobre los componentes pedagógicos de los cursos online masivos, Comun. Online courses have become a tool that allows people to obtain knowledge rapidly, and as researchers, to adapt to these modalities makes the distribution of information faster and easier. This research is made to be implemented in the Image Processing Research Laboratory (INTI-Lab) server and to use the platform at the beginning of the year 2020. Therefore, the three platforms` comparison was performed by measuring the following points: Description of the platforms` characteristics, description of the functionality, and the comparative analysis. For this purpose, it is necessary to use tools adapted to the way of working that are user-friendly and can be adapted to the users` requirements. In the research administration of the University of Sciences and Humanities, a platform of online courses is aimed to achieve training and project courses that will be focused on the institution`s researchers. The present paper is a comparison of three types of e-learning management systems. Comparison of Learning Management System Platforms For Choosing A Suitable Platform For Users In Research Administration International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology, 69(1), 81-84. ![]() "Comparison of Learning Management System Platforms For Choosing A Suitable Platform For Users In Research Administration" International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology 69.1(2021):81-84.ĪPA Style:Alicia Alva, Fiorella Flores Medina, Hugo Obispo Mego, Enrique Lee Huamani, Avid Roman-Gonzalez. MLA Style: Alicia Alva, Fiorella Flores Medina, Hugo Obispo Mego, Enrique Lee Huamani, Avid Roman-Gonzalez. International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology (IJETT)Īuthors : Alicia Alva, Fiorella Flores Medina, Hugo Obispo Mego, Enrique Lee Huamani, Avid Roman-Gonzalez Comparison of Learning Management System Platforms For Choosing A Suitable Platform For Users In Research Administration ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |